blank
Animated Button



free food recipes
Main Menu
  • Home
  • News Resources
  • Action Archive
  • Suggest News
  • Syndicate this site (XML)
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy

  • Action Item
    Previous action items are online in the Action Archive

    Privacy Resources
  • International
  • Consumer
  • Children
  • Government - FTC
  • Government - EU
  • Government -OECD
  • Research
  • Publications
  • EPIC Online Guide
  • Tools
  • Search Web
  • Search Legislation
  • « July 2004 | Main | September 2004 »

    August 16, 2004

    California Moving to Protect E-Mail Privacy

    A new bill would extend privacy protection to e-mail for California workers. The legislation should it become law would require that employers notify employees about e-mail monitoring activity inside or outside of the workplace. The trend of employers providing home computers and Internet access has raised the issue of privacy at home as well as in the workplace. One study estimates that 43% of large companies employee staff to read e-mail.

    California Bill Would Extend Privacy Protection To E-Mail, Information Week, August 11, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 12:03 PM

    Feds Back Appeal of CA Privacy Law

    The six federal government agencies sided with three bank associations in their attempt to repeal the State of California's privacy law that recently went into effect. The Office of Thrift Supervision, Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, National Credit Union Administration and the Federal Trade Commission filed friend of the court briefs in support of the American Bankers Association, the Financial Services Roundtable and the Consumer Bankers Association challenge to the new state law. The California privacy law requires that banks get customer approval before sharing information on their bank balances or spending habits with non-affiliated institutions.

    Feds Back Appeal of Financial Privacy Law, Kansas City Star, August 11, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 11:15 AM

    Privacy Policy Advice to Companies: Build a Data Map

    How should privacy professionals employed by private companies keep up with how well their employers are complying with stated privacy policy? The answer according to one privacy lawyer is to build a data map. The data map would track what information comes into the company's computers and for what reason and monitor who has access to that information. It is believed that without that knowledge it is impossible for a company to know if it is in compliance with its own privacy policy.

    The Privacy Lawyer: It's Time To Build A Data Map, Information Week, August 9, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 11:00 AM

    August 9, 2004

    Small Town America Joining Opposition to the Patriot Act

    Tumwater, Washington City Council on July 20 joined the growing list of communities that have voted to oppose enforcement of the U.S. Patriot Act. The Council also voted to direct city employees to not support actions that would be in violation of the Constitution. Those on both extremes of the political spectrum voiced support for the City Council’s actions. The city has a population of 13,000 residents.

    Sensing the Eyes of Big Brother, and Pushing Back, New York Times, August 8, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 5:42 PM

    August 4, 2004

    Tapping Internet Phone Calls

    The Federal Communications Commission tentatively ruled that Internet phone service providers must make their equipment accessible for federal law enforcement wiretaps. By a unanimous vote the five member FCC directed that voice over Internet protocols or VoIP is subject to the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which created rules that allow law enforcement to keep pace with changes in telecommunication technology. The Internet is not primarily a voice communication technology. Leaving many privacy experts are ask where will the line be drawn and by whom?

    FCC: Web phone calls must allow wiretaps, MSNBC Online, August 4, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 4:37 PM

    August 2, 2004

    Colorado Court Violate Privacy of Accuser

    After several embarrassing leaks of personal information about the accuser in the Kobe Bryant sexual assault case the judge presiding over the case apologized. The accusers parents were present in the courtroom to hear the judge’s apology for the leaks of information, including the name, address and details about her sex life of the accuser to the media. The judge characterized the three leaks as clerical errors that allowed the sensitive information to become public.

    Bryant judge apologizes for leaks, San Jose Mercury News, August 2, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 3:58 PM

    9/11 Commission's Report Tugs at Privacy Rights

    A careful review of the 9/11 Commission Recommendations reveals that everything from new federal standards for state issued driver licenses to sophisticated bomb detection screening devices in airports would challenge the privacy rights of individuals living in the United States. It has been reported that President Bush will adopt some measures recommended by the Commission by Executive Order, thereby bypassing the regular legislative process of Congressional review.

    Security changes may limit privacy, Dallas Fort Worth Star, July 30, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 3:40 PM

    CAPPS II: Questionable Judgment

    W. Stephen Thayer is the current deputy chief of the Transportation Security Administration's Office of National Risk Assessment, which is responsible for the oversight of the Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS II) program. Because of the controversy surrounding CAPPS II and its recent scrapping because of privacy concerns by the Homeland Security Department some question the wisdom of selecting such a controversial person to manage the project in the first place. Thayer resigned his state bench four years ago to avoid prosecution for conduct while on the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

    Judge Picked for Anti-Terrorism Post, Kansas City Star, August 2, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 3:29 PM

    The E-Mail Privacy Act

    A bipartisan bill introduced by two Republicans and two Democrats would establish e-mail privacy rules that would place restrictions on the accessing or storage of private e-mail messages by third parties. It would go a long way in establishing e-mail privacy protections that are similar to some of the restrictions on third party access to residential and commercial mail deliveries. The bill was reported as an attempt to address the federal court decision in the Councilman case, which found that e-mail was not protected under the Wiretap Act.

    Congressmen Table Email Privacy Bill, The WHIR's Web Host News, July 28, 2004

    Posted by EPIC at 2:35 PM

    Privacy.org is a joint project of
    The Electronic Privacy Information Center and Privacy International.
    © 1998-2003 EPIC and PI
    This web site was made with Movable Type.
    Web space for this page was donated by 2RAD.

    Comments or suggestions? Email the webmaster.

    Powered by
    Movable Type 2.51

    Recent Stories
    August 16, 2004
  • California Moving to Protect E-Mail Privacy

  • August 16, 2004
  • Feds Back Appeal of CA Privacy Law

  • August 16, 2004
  • Privacy Policy Advice to Companies: Build a Data Map

  • August 9, 2004
  • Small Town America Joining Opposition to the Patriot Act

  • August 4, 2004
  • Tapping Internet Phone Calls

  • August 2, 2004
  • Colorado Court Violate Privacy of Accuser

  • August 2, 2004
  • 9/11 Commission's Report Tugs at Privacy Rights

  • August 2, 2004
  • CAPPS II: Questionable Judgment

  • August 2, 2004
  • The E-Mail Privacy Act


  • Archive
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009